FLUORIDE

#7 Fluoride Is Harmful

Incredibly, the federal government is finally admitting that high levels of fluoride in our drinking water can be harmful. In fact, the feds have reduced the "recommended amount" of fluoride in our drinking water for the first time in 50 years. We probably won't see them ban fluoride any time soon, but for them to even acknowledge a problem with fluoride is a major step. In a recent article on CNN, it was reported that the federal government is now saying that high levels of fluoride in the water have now officially been linked with fluorosis.... The Department of Health and Human Services and Environmental Protection Agency are proposing the change because of an increase in fluorosis – a condition that causes spotting and streaking on children's teeth.

• Full Documentary - The Flouride Deception | HERE
• The Great Culling: Our Water Official Full Movie | HERE
• Professor Paul Connett: Your Toxic Tap Water | HERE

Government recommends lowering fluoride levels in U.S. drinking water

By Saundra Young, CNN

January 7, 2011 -- Updated 2010 GMT (0410 HKT)

The American Dental Association says the new recommended fluoride levels will reduce tooth decay.

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

• There has been an increase in a condition called fluorosis
• It causes spotting and streaking on children's teeth
• The ADA says the new levels will still reduce tooth decay but minimize fluorosis
• Fluoride was first added to U.S. drinking water in the 1940s

(CNN) -- The federal government is recommending changing the amount of fluoride in drinking water for the first time in 50 years.

The Department of Health and Human Services and Environmental Protection Agency are proposing the change because of an increase in fluorosis -- a condition that causes spotting and streaking on children's teeth. The government is proposing that the recommended amount of fluoride in drinking water be set at 0.7 milligrams per liter of water. The recommended range has been 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter since 1962. The EPA will determine whether the maximum amount of fluoride allowed in water will also be lowered. Fluoride was first added to water in the United States in the 1940s to help prevent tooth decay in children 8 years and under. "One of water fluoridation's biggest advantages is that it benefits all residents of a community -- at home, work, school or play," said Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Health Dr. Howard Koh. "And fluoridation's effectiveness in preventing tooth decay is not limited to children, but extends throughout life, resulting in improved oral health." The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says dental fluorosis is highest among adolescents between the ages of 12 an 15. One reason for the increase in fluorosis: Americans now have access to fluoride from a variety of sources, including toothpaste, mouth rinses and prescription supplements, the Department of Health and Human Services says "Dental fluorosis in the United States appears mostly in the very mild form -- as barely visible lacy white markings or spots on the enamel," The department said in a statement Friday. "The severe form of dental fluorosis, with staining and pitting on the tooth surface, is rare in the United States." The change is being made now, according to an administration official, because the current range is out of date. He said that in the 1960s, when fluoridating water began, air conditioning was much less common. So children in hotter regions drank more water and needed lower levels of fluoride to protect their teeth, while children in colder climates drank less water and needed higher levels. "Now since air conditioning is so common," the official said, "you don't see those differences in consumption, and that's why they're getting rid of the range and recommending one level."

The American Dental Association says the new recommended levels will still reduce tooth decay but minimize fluorosis. The group says it continues to support fluoridation of community water as a safe and effective way to prevent tooth decay. "This is a superb example of a government agency fulfilling its mission to protect and enhance the health of the American people," said ADA President Dr. Raymond F. Gist. "We have always looked to the federal health agencies to guide us on this and other public health matters, and we will continue to do so. We applaud the Department of Health and Human Services for reaffirming the safety and efficacy of optimal community water fluoridation, with science on their side."

The Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit organization whose goal is to protect public health and the environment, says it has been pushing governmental officials to reduce fluroide levels for years.

"We've had to wait too long, but the government's official, belated -- and perhaps begrudging -- announcement marks its recognition that fluoride policies have been out of step with the science on the tap-water additive's toxicity to children, and that many American children are at risk from excess fluoride in drinking water and other sources," said Jane Houlihan, senior vice president for research at the Environmental Working Group. "Since 2005, EWG has been calling on federal agencies to respond to these findings, which come from National Academy of Sciences and many others, documenting that excess fluoride exposure poses dangers that range from discolored teeth to potential hormone disruption and neurotoxicity. HHS has taken an important first step. Now it's up to water utilities to respond and for the EPA to lower its high, legal limit on fluoride in drinking water, which is more than five times higher than the new maximum recommended amount." The recommendations have been submitted to the Federal Register for a 30-day public comment period. The final version is expected this spring.

The water fluoridation controversy [1]

Arises from moral, ethical, political, and safety concerns regarding the fluoridation of public water supplies. The controversy occurs mainly in English-speaking countries, as Continental Europe has ceased water fluoridation. Those opposed argue that water fluoridation may cause serious health problems, is not effective enough to justify the costs, and has a dosage that cannot be precisely controlled. In some countries, fluoride is added to table salt. At the dosage recommended for water fluoridation, the only known adverse effect is dental fluorosis, which can alter the appearance of children's teeth during tooth development. Dental fluorosis is considered cosmetic and unlikely to represent any other effect on public health. Despite opponents' concerns, water fluoridation has been effective at reducing cavities in both children and adults. Opposition to fluoridation has existed since its initiation in the 1940s. During the 1950s and 1960s, some opponents of water fluoridation suggested that fluoridation was a communist plot to undermine public health.

Forced Fluoridation of The Jewish People By the Rothschild Zionist Controllers~ 

Adding fluoride has been [intended as a measure] to improve the health of the teeth but opposition has been arising due to a fear that fluoride is likely to damage the teeth and even to cause cancer. Now the committee is recommending that fluoridation be stopped until the matter has been appropriately researched. In the meantime, every municipality will decide independently whether or not to fluoridate. Four years after the Health Ministry decided to add fluoride to Israel’s drinking water in order to reduce dental caries, a special committee is recommending that the Ministry cease water fluoridation. The reason: not a single definitive study demonstrates that the process has any benefit for dental health. On the contrary, other existing research demonstrates that adding fluoride might even be harmful. It has become known to “Yediot Achronot” that the [committee’s] recommendation will be passed on to the Health Ministry in the next few weeks. Adding fluoride to Israel’s water systems began in the early 80’s in Gush Dan and about four years ago a regulation came into effect requiring all municipal authorities to add fluoride to the drinking water for the purpose of improving dental health. 

However, in the Knesset [Israeli Parliament] the regulation blew up a storm already then. Beyond the social protest against enforcing water fluoridation on the entire populace, points were also raised about harm to health and the environment. Opponents of fluoridation, likewise, introduced research studies that show that adding fluoride not only doesn’t reduce dental cavities. It also may cause damage to the teeth and bones. It has been further found that in high concentrations this substance may cause cancer. 

On the other hand, the proponents [of fluoridation] state that there is no absolute proof of damage to the health and that, in any case, there is no risk of danger at the low level at which it is added. In any case, even though the regulation came into effect in 2002 not all local authorities have complied. Currently about 65% of the population are drinking fluoridated water. 

One year after the regulation came into effect the subject of fluoridation became one of the most contentious issues in the committee, headed by Professor Avner Adin, for up-dating drinking water standards. Preliminary conclusions presented by the Adin committee determined that the research studies presented to his committee were either contradictory or of mediocre quality at best. For instance, some of the studies showed a rise in the percentage of children not in need of dental fillings in the areas in which fluoride was being added to the water while other studies showed no difference in the rate of decrease in caries between countries which fluoridate and those which do not. In a interim decision the committee determined that, until a comprehensive study to look into the effects of fluoridation, is carried out in Israel, there is no room to stop fluoridation. But such a study is likely to take about five years and in a heated debate that took place two days ago within the committee, a contrary decision was taken by a majority of one vote. 

According to Professor Adin it has been decided that the committee will recommend removing the requirement to add fluoride to the water and that every municipal authority will be permitted to make its own decision. The committee’s decision will be in effect until the conclusion of the comprehensive study and the decision as to what action to take in the future will be made of the basis of its findings. It is assumed that adoption of this recommendation will result in most local authorities ceasing to add fluoride to the drinking water for the time being. 

“ADDING FLUORIDE REDUCES CARIES,”
says Professor Chaim Tal, in favor of adding fluoride. 

Adding fluoride to drinking water substantially reduces the number of dental caries, asserts Professor Chaim Tal, head of the School of Dentistry at Tel Aviv University. Two Israeli studies have found lower cavity levels in children aged 5-12 in fluoridated areas as compared with [children of the same age] in non-fluoridated areas. One of the studies found that the level of caries was 24% higher in the non-fluoridated areas than in those where fluoride was being added. The gap between the poisonous level of fluoridated water and the therapeutic level at which fluoride is added, is very great. Therefore, there is no danger from routine utilization with all acceptable methods in practice today. 

Fluoridation of drinking water is the most efficient and best proven measure for lowering dental caries in the world at large and in developing countries where dental caries are high as in Israel in particular. As dental care is not included in the national health insurance package, fluoridating drinking water is essential. 

“FLUORIDE MAY CAUSE CANCER,”
states Shimon Tsuk, opposed to adding fluoride 

We are now at a point where there is an excess of fluoride in the environment. Even if fluoride is effective in preventing cavities we must discontinue adding it to our drinking water in order to avoid poisoning, states Shimon Tsuk, hydrologist at the Israel Union for Environmental Defense. A month ago the American Dental Association recommended that parents of infants up to one year old avoid using fluoridated water when preparing baby formulas. There is evidence that infants absorb large quantities [of fluoride] into their systems and this effects teeth and bones, says Mr. Tsuk. 

Where the fluoride level in water is high one can observe white spots on people’s teeth and where the level is very high yellow or brown spots occur. Fluoride is absorbed into the bones and a recent American study found a correlation between children who developed bone cancer and also were drinking fluoridated water during childhood. In Europe dental health care is included in the national health care programs, whereas in Israel it is not. This is one of the justifications which government health care officials give for adding this dangerous substance to the water.

_____________________________________________________________________
Fluoridation Suit Filed in Israel 

Israel requires all water districts serving at least 5,000 users to fluoridate. Suit has been filed against the practice of fluoridation. Follow this link: HERE 

Here is the Google translation: 

Court first discuss the core issues of water fluoridation, including issues were previously Conspiracy Theory “such as the consent of the governments around the world pour into industrial byproducts of drinking water instead require polluting industries to plant and dispose of them safely. 

Today, 12 November 2012, at 09:00 tribunal of Justice in Jerusalem 

Jacob Gorman, Chairman of balancing returns and his attorney attorney Dan Ashkenazi and they wrote a legal petition Requiring the State of Israel and head of the state health system, Health Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Immediately cancel the addition of acid Hfloorsilitzit (the fluoride) who drink of the citizens of the state. 

Petition
Serving the petition – the “balance returns to” spreading health education in Israel, with attorney Dan Ashkenazi and Dikla Dan Burns from Ashkenazi Mcf”s, argues that adding industrial waste drinking water (or her full name – Acid Floaorosilitzit) severely affects the health of Israeli citizens and is thus forced medical treatment without consent, a crime under the laws of the State of Israel. 

The petition has about 30 pages (not including the opinion) contains expert opinions water engineer Ehud there and a medical opinion from Dr. Arie blocks. 

• Two opinions and accurate data and information found petition the cast shadow
• The mechanism of decision-making in the medical system, especially the Director General, Ministry of Health, Roni Gamzu and Deputy Health Minister Yaakov Litzman
• Two people who support water fluoridation stubborn, against many professional opinion, prevented the citizens of the State of Israel from getting clean drinking water with toxic chemicals, by-products of polluting industries.

The first sentence appears petition concludes my opinion the nature of the petition and the seriousness with which the balance Association refer back to the point: 

“This petition deals with paternalistic government action without authority, which forced respondents to residents of the State of Israel to put their bodies chemical, fluoride, by adding those drinking piped into homes.As detailed in the body of this petition, the material it requires respondents to state water suppliers add those drinking, is a toxic substance, dangerous, carrying hazardous materials information on fluoride itself, the manner of delivery does not allow any monitoring of the final result, it has serious side effects. ” 

In a press release published by the Association balance back (attached as download and read at the bottom of the article) says the organization: 

In Israel institutionalized state the process called “Fluoridation” in 2002 in the publication of Regulation teacher every locality larger than 5000 residents Hfloaorosilitzit add the acid to drinking water. The source of the acid, (which is basically industrial waste) by 2009 was from fertilizers and chemicals, which sold it to residents of the state water providers, such as Mekorot and private water associations. 

Following public pressure, the distribution of network information, and protests, chemicals and fertilizers has decided to stop providing the acid, wanting to spend itself this negative spotlight. Since 2009, the state buys Hfloaorosilitzit acid and phosphates fertilizers plants in Spain and China. 

We asked if he believes there is a chance for the petition said Jacob, “we assume today address very clear on the wall in front of the Ministry of Health, Health Minister and Deputy Minister of Health. Acid Hfloaorosilitzit is toxic industrial waste and no right and permission to stream it our waters.” 

This is not the first time
This petition is the first petition filed in the High Court against the State of Israel and to nullify the addition of fluoride to those who drink. 

In 2002 (HCJ 4529/02) The first petition was filed by the Local Government Center, Herzliya municipality and the Israel Union for Environmental Defense against the State of Israel and the Ministry of Health 

With petitioners demanded immediate halt to water fluoridation acid Floorsilitzit. 

This petition was filed after the then health minister’s call ignored Committee chairman, Labor, Welfare and Health Committee “to consider the suspension of the regulations, or cancellation, or postponement for a period of one year to re-examine this issue.” 

Supreme Court advised the petitioners to withdraw their petition to allow the Ministry of Health to examine the issue further. 

In 2003, a committee established by the Ministry of Health, headed by Prof. Avner Adin. 

After two years of sitting on the pot, the committee submitted its recommendations in March 2005. 

Among the recommendations – the repeal of compulsory fluoridation. 

Also immediately rejected this recommendation on the – by then Health Minister CEO.
Banana Republic 

A few months ago a brave attempt to pass a law in the Knesset that would prevent the addition of acid Hflorsilitzit those of our drinking water. As someone who was in a Knesset debate on the bill initiated by the waves and flame, I saw with my own eyes the conduct of Members of Knesset and especially the arrogant paternalism Health Ministry Director Ronnie Gamzu and other representatives of the Ministry of Health. Despite the unwavering support of 57 Members of Knesset bill to cancel fluoridation, despite the opposition of the professional bodies, Although medical opinion, including the opinion of the Nobel Prize winner, continued CEO Health Minister and Deputy Minister of Health 

To retain the altar of stupidity I set only colonialism egotistical. 

They treat us as stupid and ignorant natives who know what is good for them and so they allow themselves to decide for us, Despite widespread opposition, what would be the water that we drink. 

No more.
This step of filing a Supreme Court demonstrates that the responsibility for our lives we must demand and take. 

I hope you’ll understand sitting ivory towers (Have you noticed the pun?) Of government 

Who has the right to continue to introduce them to the drinking water of the people of Israel the most dangerous poisons,  And I hope that this time, unlike in the past, they did not ignore rulings, committee decisions, consulting experts – and above all, public resistance,

And do the right thing. HERE

4/4/2013 

(NaturalNews) All those who promote the addition of fluoride into municipal water supplies are conscious liars. They know that the so-called "flouride" pumped into the water is actually a deadly chemical used as an insecticide, often imported from China. 

It's called hydrofluosilicic acid, and it's not "naturally-occurring fluoride" as they claim. They are fully aware of this, but they choose to lie and deceive the public by stating they are only "rebalancing" the water with a natural element. 

In truth, the chemical fluoride used in water fluoridation is also derived from phosphate mining operations as well as nuclear fuels processing. Doctors and dentists who promote fluoride actually hope to see people harmed by it because it means more business for them. A fluoride-damaged dental patient can produce thousands of dollars in revenue for a dentist, and a fluoride-damaged hospital patient can generate millions of dollars in medical procedures. 

Chinese exporters of fluoride chemicals describe fluoride as follows:
It is used in the manufacture of effervescing steel, and the smelting and refining of light metals. It is also used in fluorination of drinking water, as a wood preservative, an adhesive preservative. An insecticide, a protective coating for metals, a pickle for steels and other metals, a flux for soldering and welding, as well as a flux and pacifier for ceramic, glass and porcelain enamel. (SOURCE)

Here are two images take from the website of Chinese fluoride exporters. Notice all the industrial uses for this insecticidal chemical? 

Fluoride pushers know they are pushing poison 

I have met lots of doctors and dentists who advocate water fluoridation. Every one of them is fully aware that it isn't "natural" fluoride being pumped into the water. They know it's a harmful chemical, but they push it anyway. That makes them all "science" criminals who are knowingly harming people. Just like GMOs and vaccines, water fluoridation poisoning is all conducted in the name of "evidence-based science." Top ten ways humanity is being murdered in the name of 'evidence-based science' (#3 Fluoride) - 4/4/2013 

A Sheep No More : FLUORIDE

What if CNN, Dateline NBC, 60 Minutes, or some other network prime time “mainstream news” program did a HUGE NATIONAL STORY about how fluoride in public water is causing Alzheimer’s, Osteoporosis and Arthritis, and nearly every city and county in America would be removing it from the public water supply starting first thing Monday? Then you found out the very next morning that your town or city was not on that list, because your mayor just switched from a job at a chemical company, and he or she is “all for fluoridated water.” Are you worried? Do you run out a buy expensive filters at the hardware store for your sinks, for your showers, for everything? (HERE) Does it seem so RADICAL of a concept, like some horribly unethical plan to make money off people’s sickness? Or is it just paranoia, now being spread by the ever so popular nightly news? (HERE) Then you start thinking, wait a second, could people go to jail for coming up with this idea, of fluoridating the water, or did they already go to jail for MASS MURDER? Maybe it’s time to do a little homework for yourself, especially since it’s now all over the news. (HERE) 

A company called IG Farben worked closely with the Nazi regime and the SS, functioning like a war driving machine, donating some 80 million Reichsmarks in return for chemical, pharmaceutical and petrochemical industries which were seized by Hitler from the occupied countries. IG Farben then used huge investment capital from the one and only John D. Rockefellerand his Standard Oil Company to fund the creation and use of Zyklon B pesticide to gas millions of Jews to death. Scientists from IG Farben went on to work for the United States in major capacities, from designing rockets to DESIGNING FOOD CHEMICALS AND CHEMOTHERAPY (It began as “Project Paperclip”).(HERE) 

Toxic water was a planned conspiracy
A study published in Environmental Health Perspectives just two years ago confirmed that fluoridated water causes brain damage in children. The study was the 24th one on the same subject, and the results were SO EVIDENT that experts thought it could be the end of water fluoridation. The fluoride levels in the children’s blood were so high, if the study had reached the nightly news, America would be up in arms, demanding action. 

Getting paranoid yet? Or what if the word paranoia itself needs to be redefined? Maybe the dictionaries should redefine the political correctness of the word paranoid in order to fit in with modern day insanity when it comes to buying toxic food instead of Mother Nature’s untainted organic food and “medicine.” 

The gap is narrowing. The gap between what is believed about the history of America as being such a noble nation that feeds and “polices” the world, and the modern day notion that the government not only doesn’t regulate and minimize toxic food and medicine, but promotes it and prospers from it, in more ways than any other generation of wealth. 

If you think by looking the other way when the truth hits, that somehow it won’t hit you, or affect you and your family, you’re wrong. Disease is being bred in toxic food and medicine which is for sale all around you. If you’re shopping at all the wrong stores, you’re “buying cancer.” Put it this way, if you got lost in some forest and some “bad guys” were shooting tiny poisonous arrows at you, could you just look the other way and keep walking, or would you end up dying much sooner than necessary? 

Take the last decade of collateral damage for example After the Bush Administration’s reckless push of high fructose corn syrup and Donald Rumsfeld’s care free push of artificial sweeteners and dangerous prescription drugs, America is living inside a downward spiral. President Obama has done next to NOTHING to fix these monstrous issues. Add in Monsanto’s GMO corn and soy and it’s likesome modern day genocide. 

Nazi Germany wasn’t a conspiracy theory, it was real, but people underestimated the movement as it rose up, and look what happened. (HERE) During the war, the Nazi’s tested extreme, intolerable conditions on Jews, the way we test monkeys and treat animals in the U.S., including the ones most carnivores eat today. How are GMO, poison-laden foods, which are proven to cause cancer, so different from pushing dangerous, chemical laden vaccines (like swine and flu shots) on humans? How similar were the Nazi concentration camp conditions to the conditions we find many animals living in today – trapped in a horror story from birth to miserable death – also known as CAFO’s, or Concentrated (or Confined) Animal Feeding Operations? 

The WAR for chemical free food and water
There is a war going on today: the war for chemical-free food and water. For over 75 years, the concept of organic food for disease prevention and cure has been suppressed, and the entire practice of non-Allopathic medicine has also been suppressed. Many alternative doctors have been persecuted and even assassinated. Hundreds of known disease causes and cureshave been and still are buried under the rug, kept out of the mainstream media, out of the medical journals, and out of the mouths of the doctors who “sell you on their latest prescription drug.” Chronic diseases; we know today so well could be cured with simple, inexpensive natural therapies. Dr. Herbert Ley, the former United States FDA Commissioner has been quoted, “What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it is doing are as different as night and day.” 

Free downloadable PDF. Covers Nazi connections with Big Pharma, war crimes of Bayer, the weapons origins of prescription medications, the shocking history of psychiatric medicine and much more. 

Sources for this article include:  

HERE | HERE |HERE | HERE | HERE | HERE | HERE

• The Great Culling- Our Water Official Full Movie | HERE
• Fluoride Deception | HERE
• Professor Paul Connett: Your Toxic Tap Water | HERE

THIS PLANT CAN Be Used To REMOVE FLUORIDE FROM DRINKING WATER, Providing a Cheap Alternative for the World’s Poorest People 

AN exciting and new water treatment breakthrough has been announced that will now make the removal of fluoride from the drinking water supplies of the world’s poorest people more affordable than ever.

Researchers from Rajasthan University in India have discovered that the Tulasi plant, also known as Holy Basil, can be used to significantly reduce the amount of fluoride in drinking water.
At present, the most reliable methods used to remove excessive fluoride from drinking water are either too expensive or not suitable for the environments where they are needed most.
The method discovered by researchers from Rajasthan University is safe, cheap and readily available, making it an ideal alternative for communities who can’t afford to use the more advance techniques of removing fluoride that are readily available in the west.
AN experiment was conducted in the Yellareddyguda village of Narketpally Mandal. The researches soaked 75mg’s of Tulasi leaves in 100ml of water that contained 7.4 parts per million of fluoride in the water.
After only soaking the Tulasi leaves for eight hours, it was discovered that the level of fluoride in the water was reduced from 7.4 parts per million, to only 1.1 parts per million.

At present, the world health organisation recommends that the safe level of fluoride in drinking water is between 0.5 to 1 parts per million.
THE dangers of drinking water that contains high levels of fluoride are well-known. Some of the known side effects of drinking water that contains fluoride are dental fluorosis,reduces intelligence in children and a damaged the nervous system.
This new water treatment option will now provide the world’s poorest people an opportunity to remove excessive fluoride from their drink water supplies.
However, more research is still needed to identify and validate the effectiveness of using Tulasi leaves as a means of removing fluoride from drinking water supplies.


CONSIDERING the cost prohibitive nature of other more reliable water treatment techniques, if the Tulasi plant is conclusively proven to be effective in removing fluoride from drinking water, then we may witness a revolution in water treatment that will greatly benefit the world’s poorest people.
Andrew Puhanic is the founder of the Globalist Report. The aim of the Globalist Report is to provide current, relevant and informative information about the Globalists and Globalist Agenda. You can contact Andrew directly by visiting the Globalist Report
Written by Andrew Puhanic | HERE 

Share on Google Plus

About octadandy