AMERICAN INTIFADA, OR
DEMOCRATIC-REVOLUTION?
Our government's plans to finish
the police state are very similar to those used by the Israeli government in
the pre-Intifada days of September 2001, where the making of aggressive
preparations to create a defensible position served as the final spark needed
to start the uprising which they then planned to repel. In other words, the
provocative preparations that have been made in the name of fighting
"terror" will, at some critical point, trigger the conflagration.
Like the Israelis, the Bush government cannot know beforehand what the
"last straw" will be, but it can reasonably assume that there will be
some violent reaction to open government preparations for violence, which will
serve as legitimate provocation for the total police state transformation of
our "democracy."
According to retired Israeli
Brigadier General
Zvika Fogel (chief of staff of Southern Command headquarters
in February 2000), in
"Collision Course," By Yotam Feldman: <
"The
constellation of preparations we made actually led to the confrontation - there
was no other choice...the conceptual sequence is that we [were] creating the
conditions for a confrontation by the very fact of our preparations,"
The Israelis prepared for the
event by planning for the day after, much like America's rulers did in the
Patriot Act and the neocon Project for a New American Century plots against
freedom. They were plans for a police state, awaiting the "catastrophic
event" that would trigger them. These coups were planned to begin the day
after the next random terrorist attack set it in motion. "It is clear to
everyone that this is a self-fulfilling prophecy. We want to decide which event
would foment the explosion." Our government, like the Israelis, intended
to be the "explosion," that would come after a (Palestinian)
terrorist lit the fuse. Reflecting dominant Israeli thinking on the starting
date of the uprising, Gen. Fogel related the Zionist position, exactly the
opposite of the Palestinian testimony: "In the Gaza Strip, the second
Intifada began on September 27, 2000, the day before Ariel Sharon's visit to
the Temple Mount. A Fatah man initiated a roadside bomb attack on soldiers who
were escorting a convoy of settlers from Karni checkpoint to Netzarim [a
settlement]." In this perfect example of militant Zionist thinking, the
plan was to discreetly provoke the violence that would one day justify plans to
retaliate with overwhelming force, under the guise of "self-defense."
This aggressive mode of thinking dominates American planners, as well, with
this and other faulty Israeli strategies repeated by American forces in the war
on terror.
The Israeli plan was to come down
with the full weight of the brutal Zionist ideology, to create the"Iron Wall"
conditions that were recommended by Israeli hero Ze'ev "Wolf"
Jabotinsky (father of Jewish Defense League), intended to paralyze the
Palestinians with overwhelming fear for their lives.
This doctrine, formulated by one
of Zionism's greatest heroes, postulates that peace with the Palestinians will
only be possible when they are fully subdued into submission, on Israel's
terms, by a wall of deadly force, against which, resistance is impossible. This
is the force of division that drives the building of the "Apartheid
Wall" through Palestine. This wall strategy is the essence of American and
Israeli strategy in the war on terror – build impenetrable walls to divide and
fence the people in, then pound them into submission behind them.
"Settlement can thus develop
under the protection of a force that is not dependent on the local population,
behind an IRON WALL which they will be powerless to break down. ....a voluntary
agreement is just not possible. As long as the Arabs preserve a gleam of hope
that they will succeed in getting rid of us, nothing in the world can cause
them to relinquish this hope... only then will the moderates offer suggestions
for compromise. Then only will they begin bargaining with us on practical
matters, such as guarantees against PUSHING THEM OUT, and equality of civil,
and national rights." Ze'ev Jabotinsky.
According to Gen. Fogel, "we
opened a dialogue of weapons." (Here is a video of Israelis
"dialoging" a bunch of protesters along the "Apartheid
Wall" which runs through Bil`in, Israel.) This video tells a portion of
this fascist torment first hand, taking the reader where my words cannot go.
Their "dialogue" would
eventually escalate to the point where "no one died a natural death in the
Gaza Strip - they were all killed by us." After the Intifada and Israeli
operations were well underway, the Israelis created "death zones in the
Gaza Strip - areas in which IDF soldiers were authorized to open fire at anyone
who entered them. "We understood that in order to reduce the margin of
error, we had to create areas in which anyone who entered was considered a
terrorist." American leaders have delineated a symbolic "death
zone," of silence on the most controversial elements of the 9/11 cover-up
and the war on terror, where those "un-Americans" who dare to ask the
wrong questions are labeled terrorist-supporters, with their careers and
possibly their freedom in danger of being shot down.
Fogel feels justified in what
they did in Gaza then, as well as in the unfolding operation there now, arguing
that the end justifies the brutal means used to get there. "I say that the
operation in Gaza is a necessity that has to be carried out in conjunction with
other actions.... After all, after an equation is created, when it will be
clear that you are not afraid of entering the Gaza Strip [kill zone] and
striking at them, the majority - who are rational - will understand that it is worthwhile
to live." Afterwards, the Iron Wall essence of Zionist ideology will have
been justified, by these standards. The same line of reasoning is being used to
justify the slow adaptation of brutal fascist Israeli tactics as standard
operating procedure for America's police forces.
The closer we get to zero hour
for the American police state, the more brutal police policies here become.
More and more, we are being conditioned to seeing large groups of police
dressed in military style uniforms brutally suppressing political dissent.
Weapons and tactics used are increasingly the same as those used by the
military for crowd control in war zones. The epidemic of tasering, clubbing,
secret arrests and police harassment, directed at Americans who boldly express
themselves in legal acts of protest, is pumping up the volume of a building
wave of fascist oppression. The anger of those who would resist this wave of
fascism is building as well.
What will be the "red line" for America,
the crossing of which will unleash the much-anticipated social upheaval and the
ushering in of the police state?
Right-wing congressmen and
elitist commentators have been integral to the plotters, defining a non-lethal
political "kill zone," where concerned American opponents of the police
state dare not enter. Senators like Lindsay Graham, have sounded the alarm
about "fifth columnists" among the American people and Fox News types
have hyped the dangers of anti-Bush criticisms as treasonous acts, approaching
sedition, spelling-out the parameters of unacceptable debate. Cross into the
"kill zone" at your own peril! Journalists have been warned over and
over that their actions "provide aid and comfort to the enemy."
Journalists, bloggers and radical
radio hosts who violate the rules of allowed debate, like the leaders of the
Palestinian liberation movement, will pay the price, when the time is right.
Following the pattern of escalation set by Israel, we are witnessing the
transformation of our democracy in stages. Even though the government repression
here is still in the non-lethal stage, at a moment's notice the plans for total
militarization of America's streets could go into effect. Tasers and pepper
spray can be replaced at any time with much deadlier "dialogue." Like
Israel, when the crackdown here begins, we can expect to see mass arrests of
agitators and leaders.
Today, on the Alex Jones program,
Mike Rivero of WhatReallyHappened was asked what he thought were the reasons
for the escalating police brutality and threats against the outspoken. Jones
asked whether Rivero thought that the fascism would soon increase
exponentially, whether we were nearing a point where conspiracy theorist radio
hosts and free-thinking bloggers were about to be taken-up in a wave of
arrests. Mike laughed, and theorized that these escalating police tactics
merely demonstrated their complete fecklessness, in the face of a building
peaceful democratic-revolution (like that of the recently Ukrainian
"orange revolution," and elsewhere). He didn't seem to doubt that
such arrests were coming, only that if they came, they would represent acts of
desperation by the crumbling empire of the elite. Whenever we stop seeing new
daily postings at sites like PrisonPlanet, Infowars and WhatReallyHappened, we
will know that it has begun.
I believe that Mearsheimer and
Walt were absolutely right-on in their assessment of the measure of Israeli
domination of American foreign policy, and that Israel will not relent in
driving us to a catastrophe in Iran on its behalf. But the authors of The Lobby
were far too timid in their criticism of Israel, preferring to act like
gentlemen, refusing to say that Israeli actions were hostile, or a
"conspiracy" to dominate America. They protested that charges like
Israeli "control" of America's government were "canards,"
that were only used by anti-Semites. They are only "canards" if they
are not true. I hate to disappoint them, but they pretty much proved this
canard to be true. They should be man enough to admit it. No matter how much
they protest, we are like cattle being driven to the slaughter, in order to
help Israel try to stave-off the total
collapse
of Zionism, the only real "existential threat" to Israel.
In order for Israel to be the
"Jewish State" they claim to be, they must have a Jewish majority,
and this is not true in much of Israel, especially in the areas known as
"Judea and Samaria," aka. The West Bank. Zionist doctrine has always
called for expelling all but 20% of the Israeli Arabs, for
"wood-cutters" and other menial labor.
"We shall reduce the Arab
population to a community of woodcutters and waiters."-Uri Lubrani,
special adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Ben-Gurion.
The Zionist position is that
Israel stretches from the Mediterranean to the Jordan River. It is an accepted
fact that when Zionists speak of the "Palestinian state," they are
not referring to the "Occupied Territories," they are speaking of
Jordan. According to
Noam Chomsky, when Israelis say that "there can be no
additional Palestinian state," they mean other than Jordan.
Even more extremist Zionists
believe that "Eretz Yisrael" (greater Israel) covers the ancient land
of promise – stretching all the way to the Euphrates River, then to Nile,
reaching from there into central Turkey.
The more that America copies
failed Israeli policies in the war on terror, such as carrying-out targeted
assassinations using Hellfire missiles on crowded streets, the more that total
defeat is assured. The more like Israel we become, securing democratic rights
for the elite class only, the more like Nazi Germany we become. The hard truth
is that modern Israel has patterned all its anti-Palestinian policies after
those from the early stages of the fascist German regime. This is the direction
where US policies are heading. It is only a matter of time before Israel makes
the transformation to total fascism (and drives all the Palestinians from their
homes and their homeland). How long before Bush follows suit?
To oppose the violence of Zionism
and its spread to our country under the false banner of
"neoconservatism," is every patriot's duty. Anti-Zionism is not
anti-Semitism, even though the Israeli propagandists like the ADL and
this guy, and also
this
guy (the father of Daniel Pearl), keep getting free press to proclaim
the lie, in places like the Jerusalem Post.
The Zionists are using slur
tactics that will ultimately backfire on them, as we are starting to see today.
By resorting to the tactic of relying on the charge of
"anti-Semitism" as their first line of defense for every incident
where someone dares to criticize Israel or the Israel lobby, the Zionists will
see it come back to haunt them. By attempting to counter anti-Zionism or
anti-Israel statements with the same blanket of protection that is given to the
Jewish people, over the charge of anti-Semitism (in the middle of two unpopular
wars being waged for Israel), the Zionist lobby will cause unjust persecution
for all Jewish Americans. If the American Jewish community fails to separate
itself from the Zionist supporters of the war for Israel, then the rapidly
building wave of anti-Israel sentiments might easily turn into a true wave of
anti-Semitism.
Mearsheimer and Walt have
provided the documentation to prove that Israeli Zionists have been the primary
drivers for the Iraq war and now the new global war centered on Iran. Abe
Foxman and friends have tried to call these patriotic authors anti-Semitic,
charging that they are reviving the "old canard," that accuses the
Jews of starting wars. Foxman, it is not a
canard if
it is true.
Lobby-inspired legislation, like
the hate crimes bill and the Homeland Terrorism Act, focus upon conspiracy
theories, and the spreading of them. They focus upon critics of Israel,
claiming to be fighting the spreading of racial hatred. The bills' supporters
claim that what they do, they do for America.
Even though America faces no realistic threat from "homegrown
terrorists" and occasional hate crimes are no reason to shred the
Constitution. One of the central complaints cited, about the extremist belief
systems of conspiracy theorists, relates to alleged Israeli involvement in the
9-11 attacks. This is being played-up as the mother of all hate crimes, in
order to silence growing popular outrage over the cover-up and the whitewash of
one of the greatest crimes in American history. There is ample evidence of
Israeli involvement in the attacks.
To remain silent while the proof
of state involvement in the attacks is
flushed
down the memory hole, would be a crime against our forefathers and
veterans.
The Zionization of America
continues apace. The replication of Israeli police and military tactics is
accelerating America's downfall. The passage of Zionist-inspired (written) laws
is making normal political opposition to those policies nearly impossible. Like
the Israelis in the days just before the second Intifada, our government has
laid the foundations for a domestic war on protesters and resisters.
What we do
next, as concerned defenders of the homeland, will determine what form the
resistance is about to take – will we have our own peaceful "orange
revolution," or an American Intifada?
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar